Three recent Colorado Supreme Court Decisions are bad for
people charged with DUI.
People v. Hyde
A driver was in a single-vehicle accident that rendered him
unconscious. Suspecting that he had been drinking, the police had his blood
drawn after he had been taken to the hospital.
His blood was drawn while he was unconscious and unable to express his
consent. The Court determined that
Colorado’s Expressed Consent Statute C.R.S 42-4-1301(1) was sufficient consent
that the warrantless blood draw from an unconscious person was not a violation
of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches.
People v. Simpson
An Officer saw a pickup bounce off a curb four times, turn
across a median, and then oversteer into oncoming traffic while entering an
apartment complex parking lot. When asked by the Officer if he had been
drinking the driver answered yes. Driver
was ultimately transported to the hospital for medical attention. At the hospital, he was read the “Colorado
Express Consent Law Information” but told he did not have the option of a
breath test because breathalyzers are not available at the hospital. The defense challenged this as an involuntary
blood draw. The Court held that the
Expressed Consent Statute eliminated the need for the trial court to assess the
voluntariness of the defendant’s consent; therefore, the blood draw was
constitutional.
Fitzgerald v. People
The Court considered whether the prosecution can use a
defendant’s refusal to submit to blood-alcohol testing as evidence of guilt at
trial as provided for in Colorado’s Expressed Consent Statute C.R.S.
42-4-1301.1. The question was whether
the evidence of a refusal violates the Fourth Amendment. The Court held that the evidence of refusal
does not “impermissibly burden . . . a defendants Fourth Amendment right to be
free from an unreasonable warrantless search.”
Justice Hood who delivered the opinion called characterized the holding as a “short leap.”
The blood and breath tests mentioned in the cases above are
NOT performed at roadside. If an officer
asks for roadside tests including the portable breath test, be aware that they
are optional you cannot be forced to perform roadside tests. With or without the roadside test, if the
officer has probable cause to believe that you have been driving under the
influence, you will be taken to jail/hospital for a breath or blood test. You will not have the chance to consult with
an attorney.
The moral of this story is Don’t Drink and Drive.
No comments:
Post a Comment